In “Hidden Intellectualism”, Gerald
Graff talks about how educators are going about the wrong way in doing their
job. They are so focused on academic intelligence that they completely ignore
the values of being street smart. He believes that academic intelligence can be
important, but students have things called interests as well, whether it is
sports, fashion, dating or video games. If educators learn to incorporate these
interests into academics, then students would actually be able to relate and
turn it into something of educational value.
The thesis
is located at the end of the first paragraph. It states, “What doesn’t occur to
us, though, is that schools and colleges might be at fault for missing the
opportunity to tap into such street smarts and channel them into academic work.”
Graff supports his claim by using himself as an example. He takes us back us
back to his childhood, where he spent a lot of time trying to balance himself
between being book-smart and impressing the “hoods”. On one hand, he used
correct grammar and punctuation, but on the other, he had to prove he was a
fighter. He was really into sports, and he found his comfort zone in reading
sports books and magazines, a combination of the two things that originally had
him torn. It goes to show you don’t need academic excellence to do “educational”
things like debate, if it comes down to the subjects that he actually enjoys.
Graff
also explains that unlike academic subjects like Plato, interests and sports “satisfies
the thirst for community.” When a debate about sports kicks off, it’s really
anyone’s game. Anybody can have an opinion and the opportunity to throw in
their two cents. It’s all about culture, and even people you’ve never met can
join in. It is much unlike schoolwork, which is extremely limited to those that
have actually achieved academic excellence and know what they’re talking about.
Students get excited about things
like music, cars, sports and fashion. So why not let them explore these fields?
A subject that bores a student will receive lackluster responses and efforts.
If an educator is going to force a student to write a paper, they might as well
allow students to write about what they’re interested in, and save everyone’s
time and effort. The results will be a passionately written essay with tons of
facts and arguments behind it, thus meeting academic standards.
I completely agree with you when you stated that "a subject that bores a student will receive lackluster responses and efforts".
ReplyDeleteBesides getting students to be more passionate about writing, letting students write about their interests will improve their writing skill far greater than if they were forced to write about a boring topic. School should not exist to make us memorize information such as Plato Book 1, it should exist only to develop our skills such as writing, calculating, analyzing, etc. If writing about our interests is the most efficient way to develop our skills then that should be the only thing we write about.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIt is not untrue that people say no pain, no gain.
ReplyDelete